Product testing

Operation profile

Product testing, for both functionality and safety, is an essential component of bringing new products to market. In addition to the safety testing performed by regulatory agencies, many labs and testing agencies perform product testing on behalf of manufacturers. These entities may be independent labs or, alternately, may be in-house testing operations of a larger parent firm.

The representative operation modeled develops and tests electronic systems and devices, such as computer components or systems, telecommunications equipment, and electronic systems for automotive or aerospace applications. As detailed in the following table, this operation is characterized by:

  • A leased office/laboratory facility with significant investment in R&D equipment
  • A non-management workforce consisting almost entirely of professional and technical staff
  • A significant level of tax-eligible R&D activities.

The business is assumed to operate as a fully owned subsidiary of a parent firm, with revenue allocated to the business on a "cost-plus-10 percent" basis.
 

Summary of operating parameters

Industry: Product testing

Operation: Electronic systems development and testing

Facilities requirements
Class A office space leased - ft2 (4,181 m2)
45,000

Other initial investment requirements
   Machinery and equipment - US $'000
$500
   Office equipment - US $'000
$500
   R&D equipment - US $'000
$4,000 
   Inventory - US $'000
--
   Equity financing - % of project costs
100%

Workforce
   Management
5
   Sales and administration
12
   Dedicated product development
53
   Other
--
 
Total employees
70

Energy requirements
   Electricity: monthly consumption demand - kWh
75,000

Other annual operating characteristics
   Sales at full production - US $'000
**
   Other operating costs - US $'000
$1,800
   Investment in tax-eligible R&D - % of sales
19%

** This operation represents a cost center. For taxation purposes, corporate revenue allocated to the operation is assumed to be cost-of-operation, plus 10% markup.

International results

International results are illustrated in the following chart. These results reflect the combined impact of 26 location-sensitive cost components applied to the modeled operation. Detailed results for these countries, by individual cost component, are available as a separate table.

City results

The following table profiles results for selected cities, by country, from among the 111 cities featured in this report. Results for all other cities included in the study can be found in the Results lookup section of this website.

Results for selected cities
Industry: Product testing
Operation: Electronic systems development & testing
North America – selected cluster cities
Country and CityIndex & Rank1
CACalgary, AB72.519
 Gatineau (National Capital Region), QC70.915
 Quebec City, QC66.16
 Sault Ste. Marie, ON67.610
 Winnipeg, MB67.48
MXMexico City, DF56.42
 Monterrey, NL51.71
USAlbuquerque, NM83.847
 Boise, ID81.433
 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX93.290
 Denver, CO93.391
 Phoenix, AZ89.276
 Portland, OR91.186
 Raleigh, NC89.175
 Salt Lake City, UT85.253
 San Diego, CA99.9103
1  Rank among 111 featured cities.
 
 
 
International locations – all cities
Country and CityIndex & Rank1
AUAdelaide73.320
 Brisbane77.427
 Melbourne75.424
 Sydney79.028
FRMarseille73.422
 Paris83.846
GEBerlin80.429
 Frankfurt83.144
ITMilan80.730
 Rome76.526
JPOsaka81.332
 Tokyo89.982
NLAmsterdam73.823
 Rotterdam72.518
UKLondon102.0107
 Manchester75.825
1  Rank among 111 featured cities.

 
Back to index

Download now

Competitive Alternatives 2016

Study reports

 

Corporate sponsors

Colliers

Colliers International

Link
MMK Consulting

MMK Consulting

Link

Contact KPMG

KPMG

Local KPMG contacts

See contacts